"Rune S. Johansen" wrote:

> I think a 640x480 image would be the best choice. That means you can
> always see the whole image. At least I would prefer having a frame around
> the image instead of having some of the image cut off.
> We could also have multiple pictures, but wouldn't that be pretty big?
> What do you think?
<snip>

I have to add here, a web-browser can shrink an image fairly well, one
render at 1152 is good, and then shrinking it down...

As for JPEG, it is acceptable with a low degree of compression.

Wether to only distribute as a 640x480 image is not a good option,
unless there is a single colour outline of the image. I don't enjoy
having a sharp colour contrast on my desktop, it just doesn't fit with
the rest of my layout...


-- 
//Spider 
( spi### [at] bahnhofse ) [ http://www.bahnhof.se/~spider/ ]
#declare life = rand(seed(42))*sqrt(-1);

Post a reply to this message