Fine with me as long as I don't have to reference it by name.
I'll call it Y for short.

Mike wrote:
> 
> How about calling it the YKYBRTLWYCAPFMAUDTIMTTTOTCWTP?
> 
> -Mike
> 
> Ronald L. Parker wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 02 Feb 1999 18:13:15 +0100, Spider <spi### [at] bahnhofse> wrote:
> >
> > >More thoughts.
> > >If this won't change(I doubt it will) then a note in the documentation
> > >should note about this, and make the user aware of it. A thing for the
> > >UDP ?
> >
> > Aaaahhh!
> >
> > A peek inside parkrrrr's mind while he tries to decode the characters
> > "UDP"...
> >
> > "Usenet Death Penalty"  nope, that's not it.
> > "User Datagram Packet"  nope, not it either.
> > what could it be?  Oh, yeah, "User Documentation Project."
> >
> > Can we come up with a different TLA?  That one's already been
> > overused.  :)

-- 
Ken Tyler

tyl### [at] pacbellnet

Post a reply to this message