How about calling it the YKYBRTLWYCAPFMAUDTIMTTTOTCWTP?

-Mike

Ronald L. Parker wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 02 Feb 1999 18:13:15 +0100, Spider <spi### [at] bahnhofse> wrote:
> 
> >More thoughts.
> >If this won't change(I doubt it will) then a note in the documentation
> >should note about this, and make the user aware of it. A thing for the
> >UDP ?
> 
> Aaaahhh!
> 
> A peek inside parkrrrr's mind while he tries to decode the characters
> "UDP"...
> 
> "Usenet Death Penalty"  nope, that's not it.
> "User Datagram Packet"  nope, not it either.
> what could it be?  Oh, yeah, "User Documentation Project."
> 
> Can we come up with a different TLA?  That one's already been
> overused.  :)

Post a reply to this message