Rudy Velthuis wrote:
> 
> Johannes Hubert schrieb in Nachricht <36ade355.0@news.povray.org>...
> >Whoa! That is understatement if I ever heard one! To call a bug that
> >prevents 99% of all users to run the program a "minor" one! :-o
> >
> >Johannes.
> 
> Whoa! you're right. But I think he means the bug was just something like a
> typo or a wrong declaration and not something fundamentally wrong. Still,
> even a typo or forgetting to free a memory object can be very dangerous too
> (and sometimes much harder to find, btw).


Since it is JAVA, memory is not that much of an issue...
But I agree wtih the typo/wrong def. thing...
What more is it, a simple erronious compile could be disasterous.... Ie. If it was
compiled for JDK1.2, instead of 1.1.x .... That would mean taht several users can't
access
it, but it will work on the computer it was created on...

//Spider

Post a reply to this message