|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Nieminen Mika wrote:
>
> Spider <spi### [at] bahnhof se> wrote:
> :> :> Don't use media or fog.
> :> : Absolutely not...
> :>
> :> Fog isn't so cpu-hog. AFAIK fog is rather fast to calculate but achieves
> :> very nice results.
> : Yes, but then.... it is slow...
>
> AFAIK, fog is about as slow as, for example, a phong finish calculation.
> ie. rather fast.
ok.
> A fog made with media IS slow.
This is true.
>
> :> :> Don't have radiosity turned on.
> :> : Never...
> :>
> :> I wouldn't say "never".
> : Hmm, Well, not until you have patience to wait...
>
> Perhaps you have seen my radiosity test images on my page? They are all
> calculated with my good old 486 66MHz.
> Of course it requires a bit of patience.
my point.
//Spider
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |