Pedro Graterol wrote:

> Nieminen Mika wrote in message <36a21507.0@news.povray.org>...
> >
> >  The question is: Can we do anything about this?
>
> Take a look at "My Voting Philosophy" thread in irtc.general. The objective
> part
> in the voting process is the technical one.  It would be a good idea to set
> a range -or
> part- of the total to each  field, and then divide and assign those points.
> To me, such approach
> is entirely to everyone, this is, personal. But I think it is a good
> idea -to me, again- to unify concepts.
> Although such evaluation will be more work and time, it will be worthy
> regarding fairness.
>
> Marjorie Graterol

Perhaps the i.r.t.c. newsletter should address these issues. I'm not sure
of how many of the judges are currently monitoring these groups yet,
as they as still fairly new, and the importance if this issue could be
addressed to a larger body of people. Anyboy out there reading this
subsribe to the newsletter ? Who runs it and how does one submit
material to it ? Perhaps a digested collection of the responses to this
and the other similar threads could be sent out as and eduactionl
aid in the fairness and responsibility of being a judge.

--
Ken Tyler

tyl### [at] pacbellnet

Post a reply to this message