Daren Scot Wilson wrote:
> 
> Mike wrote:
> > >   After experimenting with the patch for a short time I have
> > > only one suggestion to offer. The pixels per second counter
> > > needs to be changed to read pixels per minute or maybe pixels
> > > per hour/days for slower machines ;^ }
> 
> If it's not slow enough, you can always increase the value for
> disp_nelems :-)

> Daren Scot Wilson

Maybe I should back off disp_nelems from my setting of 200.

When I responded yes to young Lance's survey about whether
I had allowed a trace to run for more than one month it
didn't allow me to mention that was on a surplus 286 8mhz
I had laying around. On my P-200 it's unacceptable. <g>

-- 
Ken Tyler

tyl### [at] pacbellnet

Post a reply to this message