Oh come on now. P-O-V (pee-oh-vee) ??
Is Pov (pah-veh)[silent h] wrong? Only because I know no one personally
to talk with and have no audible communication of the acronym to develop
my pronunciation with someone else who has POV-Ray?
Considering this thread is partly a joke, I might be beating a dead
horse.
Anyway, yes... POV-Snobbery to the end for me.
Btw, wav (PCM encoded) sound file attached ;) about 107K.

Simon de Vet wrote:
> 
> Hello, my name is Simon, and I am a POV-snob.
> 
> In particular, I am a certain type of snob.
> 
> I am a processing snob. I believe that the only pure rendered image is
> one that has not been touched in any way by any external editor.
> Copyright messages make me cringe.
> 
> I am a texture snob. If it ain't procedural, it just ain't real.
> 
> I am a modelling snob (a rare breed). If it's coded by hand, it's less
> 'artsy'.
> 
> ---
> 
> Face it. We're all snobs, in one way or another. We all believe things,
> for no apparant reasons. Well, I say this is nothing to be ashamed of!
> POV-snobs of the world, unite!
> 
> Are you a code snob (modellers are for wimps)!?
> Are you a time snob (any render under 8 hours is a waste of time!)?
> Are you a math snob (an egg is a complex equation, never a stretched
> sphere!)?
> Are you a macro snob (if it can be done with a macro, it must be!)?
> Are you a physics snob (the IOR of water is 1.332, fool! Not 1.333!!!!)?
> 
> Love to hear from you all!
> 
> BTW, this is meant as a lighthearted post... no mean debates over the
> validity of [FOO] as opposed to [BAR].... just good old fashioned
> snobbery, eh? >:)
> 
> Simon
> http://home.istar.ca/~sdevet

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
=Bob

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'pov-ray.wav.dat' (107 KB) Download 'us-ascii' (1 KB)