Vahur Krouverk wrote:
>
> Most impressive picture at my point of view was "strike". Sure, it has
> some shortages (e.g. landscape could be textured/modelled better), but
> it stroke me: only for the flames and smoke I would give 20 pts, not to
> mention about ship models, planes, etc.

I think this illustrates why 20s should be extremely rare votes.....
if there was a similar image with just flames and smoke, would it
be fair to give both comparable tech scores?

BTW I think discussion of particular images here is best avoided
until voting is over for the round, for obvious reasons.

But I will encourage voters to read the .txt files before voting....
some entries are more than "skin deep" in their content.  Additionally,
some images have more originality than others (downloaded versus
original models, for example).  

This will be an interesting round... I regret I was unable to enter
this time.

Dan

-- 
http://www.flash.net/~djconnel/

Post a reply to this message