Lance Birch wrote:

> >I don't get it. When new years day rolls around won't 2000 years
> >of human history have passed or not. Of course it will have.
> >Give it a rest and party on dude.
>
> No, it's this kind of thing that gets everyone confused.  There was no year
> 0, so the year 2000 must be completed before 2000 years would have passed.
> So the new millennium doesn't start until 1 January 2001...
>
> --
> Lance.

I'm not confused sonny boy. I said 2000 years will have passed
regardless of the starting point. Got ya !

--
Ken Tyler

tyl### [at] pacbellnet

Post a reply to this message