Ronald L. Parker wrote:
> 
> For the sphere scaling bug, at least, someone else suggested a better
> fix that adapts to smaller-sized objects without the side-effects of
> modifying EPSILON indiscriminately.  Also, you meant config.h. :)

I agree.  I did mean config.h.  And the Dan Connelly's proposed change for
the sphere scaling bug is a good one.  However, I still think that the
EPSILON in the DOS/Win versions needs to be changed.  It is much bigger
than the EPSILON used for Unix/Mac machines (or so I'm told).  Why?  They
should be consistent, IMHO.  10e-5 is really quite large... for an epsilon.
It is only 0.00001.

-Nathan Kopp

Post a reply to this message