It is a generally good practice when encountering what 
appears to be a bug in a complex scene to spend some time
simplifying it until what remains is the simplest version
which still exhibits the bug.

This greatly increases the probability folks will be able
to and willing to help you.

It also results in a considerable probability that you will
be able to track down the problem yourself.   If not, you
will at least be able to get a better idea what the problem
is.

Dan

netcourt wrote:
> When I run the below code there is a "ghost line" that appears that
> should not be there.  I don't know if this is an honest to goodness bug
> or studpidity on my part (I am kinda new to all this) but I think there
> is a calculation error taking place somewhere.  Anyway here it is, see
> if you can re-produce the error and drop me a line at ozz### [at] vnetnet
> if I am not nuts and there really is a bug..

-- 
http://www.flash.net/~djconnel/

Post a reply to this message