I too had "confidential" information about a direct jump to 4.0 after 3.1.
As it was said to be a huge rewrite, I am afraid that it might take some
time... ;-)

Ken wrote in message <360AA755.E02A2D35@pacbell.net>...
>Dan Connelly wrote:
>
>> But I am sure this will make more sense at 3.2.
>
>That's presuming a 3.2 before a 4.0. I remember a rumor to the
>effect that the Pov team was already working on parts of the
>4.0 version though I can't remember it's source or time frame.
>

Post a reply to this message