Thomas Willhalm wrote:
> > What about the problem with <1,2>.v ?
It's still there. I just checked.
But don't worry, Thomas -- with all the patch consolodation
projects, I strongly suspect this bug, if by some unusual
chance it survives to the official release, will quickly
be purged from the extended codes.
Dan
--
http://www.flash.net/~djconnel/
