Johannes Hubert wrote:

> Be warned though, that I have read several posts in the past, that there is
> a bug in this function, in connection with the functions ability to prefix
> the resulting string with zeros (do some tests of your own to see what
> happens if you use the "Prefix Zeros" option).
>
> Johannes.

Unofficial 3.0x compiles (e.g. isosurf patch) don't have this problem.
In 3.1 beta (5) it seems to work, thought I don't know, what happens, when
official (fully optimized) release gets out, for it seemed to be compiler's
(optimizer) bug, not coding one.

Post a reply to this message