PoD wrote:

> Lance Birch wrote:
> >
> > Sorry, but I'm not sure of this, but, does this have something to do with
> > scalling the normal amount?  I can't remember if this is effected...
> [...]
> Thanks for your reply.
> Yeah, tried that but surfaces with large normal values don't seem to
> render too well.

     Scale the normal, ie:

        normal{
          radial .5
          sine_wave
          frequency 12
          scale Scale
        }

    Yes? No?

        -Rozzin
--
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA/CS/L/M/P/MU/O d(-) s:-- a? C++++$>$ UL P L+ E W+++ N-(!) o? K(--) w(--)(---) O+++
M--
V? PS+++ PE Y+ PGP-(+++) t 5 X+ R* tv(+) b+ DI+ D---- G+++ e- h! r++ y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

       e-mail -- roz### [at] geekspacecom
home WWW site -- http://home.earthlink.net/~rozzin/

Post a reply to this message