Andrew McDavid <tot### [at] inamecom> wrote:
>	You said you decided _not_ to make it an NT service.  I was just
>wondering if that meant, if you had decided otherwise, there wouldn't
>have been a 95/98 verson?

Ah, I see. Yes - we had considered a NT-only version, but decided not to
because not everyone can afford to purchase NT. If it had been more available
things may have been different. There's probably a half-dozen other reasons
that it's not NT-only, too, but because of the cost it didn't even get past
first base.

Post a reply to this message