Dear all,

And more support from me, just a great service that would really need to be invented
if it wasn't already.
Well, I guess some down time showed us how much we like it. It also is a sign, I
guess, of how much work has been put in to restore a new and better news server ...
success is not easy to manage, isn't it ?

Best of luck to the lads doing the job,
Al.


Ronald L. Parker wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Mar 1998 18:15:07 +0100, mbr### [at] swipnetse (Mathias Broxvall)
> wrote:
>
> >I just want to say *thanks* for this great service. I don't understand
> >how anyone can say it's unreliable, sure - it have been going up and
> >down a little. But considering it have gone *up* after just a short
> >while means we should be thankfull. At last I would like to pointout
> >that this newsserver actually is *better* than the one my ISP provides
> >me with, my ISP's server is *slow* but this server is about 2-3 faster
> >(eventhough I probably have to cross the world a couple of times before
> >connecting!) plus this server don't have any junk mail / spamms / etc...
> >
>
> Hear, hear!  Granted, I suffered some withdrawal symptoms when all I
> had to sustain me was cgrr on my local feed, but that just shows how
> much this server must mean to me.  Keep up the good work, and don't
> let the complainers get you down.  Most of us truly appreciate what
> you're doing for us.
>
> I'll second the opinion that this server is more reliable than my
> local one.  Only about one post in ten to CGRR makes it to my home
> server.



--
ANTI SPAM / ANTI ARROSAGE COMMERCIAL :

To answer me, please take out both minus signs and both spaces from my address.

Post a reply to this message