On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:32:21 +0200, "Tim Nikias v2.0"
<tim### [at] gmxde> wrote:

>Any other ideas?

About the only thing I can think of is to supply the macro with the
definition of a mesh (not a mesh object, rather an array of vertices
and maybe an array of vertex indices) that will approximate the object
shape for simulation's sake. Providing said mesh definition should be
left as an exercise to the user.


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message