On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 18:17:07 +0100
"St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:

> 
> "marabou" <not### [at] availableyet> wrote in message 
> news:200### [at] availableyet...
> > On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 17:38:54 +0100
> > "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
[..]
> >>     If that's not viable, have you tried giving your object some
> >> thickness/depth to see if the problem is still there?
> >>
> > yes
> 
>   Hmm, then you have an interesting problem. I'll keep thinking on it.
> 
[..]
have you read this:?
news.povray.org povray.newusers:14442

Post a reply to this message