Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:

> 
> No, just weak memory management of the CodeWarrior libraries, it has nothing
> to do with 128 MB, depending on the scene you will find such a problem with
> 20 MB or with 500 MB. Did you try 3.1g.r1 yet? It can reduce such problems
> as well.   3.5 will likely have a custom memory management system to
> eliminate the problems once and for all.

For 3.1g.r1 same problem.

If codewarrior memory management is somewhat weak, I still think there
is a problem of adressing space. I was able to render the scenes with a
smaller system, thus going under the 128 Mo and it worked fine. 

But if memory management is improved with 3.5 that's a great news.

I'm new to this newsgroup, so I have only the "POV-Team Plans for 1999"
document as evolution planning. What is the timeline for 3.5 ?


JL Peuriere

-- 
GG: Si maintenant on introduit le concept de normalite des bugs,
    ou va l'informatique ?
    Chez Microsoft ? Ah oui, pas faux ca.
-+- GG in Guide du Macounet Pervers : R i F, you'll be Buggified -+-

Post a reply to this message