> > > PoD <pod### [at] merlinnetau> wrote:
				What advantage is there to a non-hollow object?
and the Magills responded later:
 
> Yes, but then doesn't that mean hollow-by-default would be good? 

	Maybe.   Better yet, how about "hollow" or its just-now-proposed
antonym "solid" NOT within any object setting the default until overridden
("hollow 1" and "hollow 0" will do if we prefer to keep reserved words to a
minimum at the cost of clarity) or reset?

	-Robert Dawson

Post a reply to this message