"Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscapenet> wrote:
> "Tor Olav Kristensen" <tor### [at] TOBEREMOVEDgmailcom> wrote:
>
>
> > In your code above you pass RX once and RY twice as arguments to your
> > SFn_vlength() function, but I guess that you intended to pass RX, RY and RZ as
> > arguments.
>
>
> TOK of the eagle eyes to the rescue again.
>
> Thanks so much - I'm sure that would have registered at some point. Works a LOT
> better now!
No problem.
I've studied your code some more - and done some experiments with it.
You are one the right track, but unfortunately I don't have enough time
to look further at it and suggest more changes.
I did a similar experiment some years ago:
Subject: With and without a light_source - 2 attachments
From: Tor Olav Kristensen
Date and time: 2003-06-23 23:19:10
Message: <Xns### [at] 204213191226>
http://news.povray.org/povray.binaries.images/32195/
Perhaps it can help if you look at the source code for it:
Subject: Source code for "With and without a light_source"
From: Tor Olav Kristensen
Date: 24 Jun 2003 18:20:41
Message: <Xns### [at] 204213191226>
http://news.povray.org/povray.text.scene-files/message/
%3CXns93A54E262AE2torolavkhotmailcom%40204.213.191.226%3E/
--
Tor Olav
http://subcube.com
https://github.com/t-o-k
Post a reply to this message
|