"s.day" <s.d### [at] uelacuk> wrote:
> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> > Very good indeed. I am not entirely sure if the spider needs SSLT
> > though. The original spider looks a tad better, but then as you say,
> > more tweaking would be needed. In any case, very well done indeed.
> >
> > --
> > Thomas
>
> I kind of agree, the original spider looked better in some ways but as I was
> updating the image thought I would try out SSLT again. The main purpose was to
> re-render with HDR and some texture tweaks.

I think if you do no SSLT on the body, and SSLT on the legs (if possible), that
would work out well.   It is of course a bit difficult to directly compare the
two, given the vastly different lighting.

Post a reply to this message