Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
By
> blurred-with-distance I would perhaps understand more a 'simplification'
> of the pattern rather than a 'blurring' like this. I don't know how to
> express this correctly. You are probably on the right track though, but
> it needs more thinking (at least for me).


Isn't that sorta what "mip-mapping" is all about?

Post a reply to this message