Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> > That too. Or lovely models or especially sets that aren't computer rendered.
>
>   It's actually surprising how much miniatures are still used in movies,
> rather than making everything with CGI. Yet, sadly, most people can't
> appreciate the huge amount of work put into those miniatures because they
> just dismiss it as a computer model.

And, conversely, the other effect - the people who dismiss even high-quality CGI
without an iota of understanding how much effort, research and talent goes into
it. Most people even seem to dismiss movie sequences as 'just cgi' even when
there isn't any. It seems trendy for people to bash movie effects as if it makes
them look clever for spotting the effects - even if it's logically impossible
for a scene to be done any other way.

Grinds my gears

Post a reply to this message