TigerHawk <tigerhawk@stic.net> wrote:
  
    Dude chill out, the world doesn't revolve around Emacs...
    
    
  But why make something that is already done (and better)?
    
      For example, while taking notes for CS I 
prefer to use jed because it's smaller
      
      
  Who cares? In modern computers the size of emacs is nothing.
      
        faster
        
        
  Faster in what way?
  If I press a key, the correspondent letter appears immediately on the
window. That's fast enough.
  I don't consider speed to be a reason to switch to another editor which
has a lot less features.
        
          and does many of the same things I need it to do.
          
          
  That's the point: It does "many", not "all".
  I personally am not prepared to change editor to a "smaller" and "faster"
one if it means I will be losing features I use.
          
            Let's 
face it, Emacs is a dusty old dinosaur
            
            
  Why all programs which have existed for long time are "old dinosaurs"?
  The current version of emacs is pretty different from the first emacs
which existed. I wouldn't call it "old".