TigerHawk <tigerhawk@stic.net> wrote:
Dude chill out, the world doesn't revolve around Emacs...
But why make something that is already done (and better)?
For example, while taking notes for CS I
prefer to use jed because it's smaller
Who cares? In modern computers the size of emacs is nothing.
faster
Faster in what way?
If I press a key, the correspondent letter appears immediately on the
window. That's fast enough.
I don't consider speed to be a reason to switch to another editor which
has a lot less features.
and does many of the same things I need it to do.
That's the point: It does "many", not "all".
I personally am not prepared to change editor to a "smaller" and "faster"
one if it means I will be losing features I use.
Let's
face it, Emacs is a dusty old dinosaur
Why all programs which have existed for long time are "old dinosaurs"?
The current version of emacs is pretty different from the first emacs
which existed. I wouldn't call it "old".