On 5/6/21 7:51 AM, William F Pokorny wrote:
> On 5/6/21 7:37 AM, Ash Holsenback wrote:
>> On 5/6/21 7:35 AM, William F Pokorny wrote:
>>> I second your thought not enough detail about the caching got into
>>> the documentation. At least, I've never run across it - those beta
>>> change notes are there, but that is not where most will look for
>>> documentation of the output file caching.
>> i do not... y'all were just looking in the wrong place
> Perhaps we do disagree. :-) I was aware of the documentation to which
> you pointed us.
> I believe our documentation would be better if somewhere it included
> everything in those beta release notes about output file caching - after
> the first paragraph. Those realease notes are well written and clear
> with several useful tips. I believe our documentation today describes
> switches with not enough about implications and use - information in
> those release to release notes.
isn't that covered in changes.txt and / or revision.txt
Post a reply to this message