Yikes! I thought Annig echoed my thoughts. Is there that big a difference between Annig's philosophy and mine? Annig was certainly more articulate in his description and probably spends more time on studying each image than I do, but the following chords from Annig resonated with me:

Annig rewards
- "realism if tried to be realistic"
- "stylistic coherence"
- "clever"
- "intelligently exploiting strengths of renderer"
- "Does it tell a story?"

and Annig penalizes
- "irrelevant details thrown in" to tie to theme

Marc Schimmler wrote:

I'am glad Ken that you quoted Jerry's post because I also think that
this was a very fair approach to voting even if I can understand Greg's
voting philosophy.