Sorry, hope I wasn't too harsh, Guillermo, and all of the flaws below don't apply to your work. Yes, there is more originality, personal pride, and technical merit in hand-made figures. That's why I create entries with what's been called "ugly" figures made out of POV-Ray blobs.
I was trying to explain to my wife about how I like a cool, 3D cartoony look. She said, "You mean Wallace and Gromit?" I said, "YES!" I think that Nick Park had more to do with my interest in raytracing more than did Jurassic Park or Lawnmower Man. Consequently, while there will always be a few great perfectly photorealistic entries at the top of the heap, I like images that look like a frame from a Nick Parks film.
Restating my advice to Nieminen, if one were to say to Nick Parks the words, "Cow in a bathtub," he'd come up with a pretty neat looking image: can you imagine it? And someone who can duplicate the fun of Park's work with raytracing will in my heart get a higher score than all but the utmostly photorealistic images.
Guillermo Espitia Rojas wrote:
Hi Greg:I am the author of ge_first. I believe that the commentaries of the judges
would have to be ample and deep, like his; although in this case I am the
victim. :-(Consider the following thing. The human figures are very difficult to model
with Pov-Ray. With Spatch something can be done better, but it continues
being difficult; the work is very long and tedious. I do not believe that I
repeat the experience. You consider that the modeled one of human figures is
not common in the IRTC (exception Lorenzo Quintana, Anto Matkovic, and Gena
Obukhov). I hope that it is evident that my " baby " is not Poser.Excuses by my English and thanks for its attention.
Guillermo Espitia
Bogotá, Colombia