 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Roberto Amorim" <wol### [at] hotmail com> wrote in message
news:4080210a$1@news.povray.org...
> Any ideas? I need some time to think...
>
> I tried looking for any hints on ftp.irtc.org, but to no avail.
I have a bunch of ideas for an animation, but I need to know the topic to choose
which one to do!
I guess the admins are busy, hopefully the topic will be announced this
weekend...
--
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in news:4080d211$1@news.povray.org:
>
> I guess the admins are busy, hopefully the topic will be announced
> this weekend...
>
Dancing
--
Tom
_________________________________
The Internet Movie Project
http://www.imp.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Galvin wrote:
>
> "Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in news:4080d211$1@news.povray.org:
>
> >
> > I guess the admins are busy, hopefully the topic will be announced
> > this weekend...
> >
>
> Dancing
Looks like another small round...
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
John VanSickle <evi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in news:40814C58.BE35A12
@hotmail.com:
>>
>> Dancing
>
> Looks like another small round...
>
>
Rusty ala hampsterdance?
--
Tom
_________________________________
The Internet Movie Project
http://www.imp.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"John VanSickle" <evi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:408### [at] hotmailcom...
> Tom Galvin wrote:
> >
> > Dancing
>
> Looks like another small round...
I wouldn't be so cynical. I think this topic has enough "What the ****?!" appeal
to attract a lot of entrants. Whereas the last topic was quite intimidating,
this one sounds nice and innocent so lots of people who might ordinarily decide
they can't commit enough time to do a really good entry (that's my usual
excuse!) may come out of their shells a little more and just experiment, since
they don't expect any serious competition this round.
That's on the one hand. On the other hand: I really can't think of any ideas!
Well, I have one but it needs good character animation and I've never done that!
:)
Anyway, changing subject slightly, isn't it a bit wierd to have a "Dancing"
competition where we have to judge without listening to the audio track?
--
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom, what happened to IMP this round? While poking around the site, I
thought I once saw a draft of a truly unique take on the SciFi concept.
Tom Galvin <tom### [at] imporg> wrote:
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Galvin wrote:
>
> John VanSickle <evi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in news:40814C58.BE35A12
> @hotmail.com:
>
> >>
> >> Dancing
> >
> > Looks like another small round...
>
> Rusty ala hampsterdance?
No, but something more in line with his physical limitations.
And while I was at my daughter's ballet class, an idea involving
the Greb in a non-humourous way came to mind.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tek wrote:
> I wouldn't be so cynical. I think this topic has enough "What the ****?!" appeal
> to attract a lot of entrants. Whereas the last topic was quite intimidating,
> this one sounds nice and innocent so lots of people who might ordinarily decide
> they can't commit enough time to do a really good entry (that's my usual
> excuse!) may come out of their shells a little more and just experiment, since
> they don't expect any serious competition this round.
And don't forget that dancing involves repeated movements, which
lend itself well to automated and looping sequences with just
some camera movements... (did i hear somebody mumble "modern pop
group/singer casting"? ;-)
Heh, "The Rusty Dancers" - the first automated boy group - no
wait, wasn't that "Take That" or someone? ;-)
> That's on the one hand. On the other hand: I really can't think of any ideas!
> Well, I have one but it needs good character animation and I've never done that!
> :)
read your first paragraph above again ;-)
> Anyway, changing subject slightly, isn't it a bit wierd to have a "Dancing"
> competition where we have to judge without listening to the audio track?
Well, you could include 5 seconds of "recommended listening:
<song> by <artist>", then a countdown "5...4...3...2...1... PRESS
PLAY ON TAPE" - thus keeping out of copyright and other issues...
("Press play on tape" - suddenly, i get this nostalgic 1980's
Commodore 64 datasette feeling ;-)
-Markus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Markus Altendorff" <maa### [at] anthrosphinxde> wrote in message
news:40823fd2@news.povray.org...
> Well, you could include 5 seconds of "recommended listening:
> <song> by <artist>", then a countdown "5...4...3...2...1... PRESS
> PLAY ON TAPE" - thus keeping out of copyright and other issues...
Ah, but I'm referring to the judging, not the copyright issue. The judges are
supposed to view animations without sound (unless the rules have changed since
last time I read them).
--
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > Dancing
>
> Looks like another small round...
Or perhaps a chance to go for interpretation of theme. As the description on
IRTC's site says...
" Any study of bodily movement done for artistic effect. "
Any movement with an aesthetically pleasing effect could be considered
dancing, and that expands the topic substantially. I'll go for that
"broader" point of view, *if* I find the time to enter the IRTC this time.
:-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
