|
 |
Op 19/05/2021 om 09:44 schreef Dave Blandston:
> "Bald Eagle" <cre### [at] netscape net> wrote:
>> So if you have a few hours, they both mention this point in their videos
>> multiple times, and might possibly do a quick few lines of throwaway code that
>> they execute to demonstrate the concept. Somewhere.
>
> OK I'm a believer in "Not_0" now (even without spending hours researching).
>
:-)
> One other consideration (not a suggestion, just a thought) might be to allow a
> margin of error since a value of 1/256 seems to indicate that the intended
> result is a value of 0 barring any of the conditions you mentioned. So if the
> lighting is even the slightest bit too bright then an unintentional "1" could
> result. So perhaps a default value with a little "wiggle room" might be
> appropriate, like 1/265 since it's an arbitrary starting point anyway.
>
Seems a good idea. Done for next beta.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
