On 5/6/21 7:51 AM, William F Pokorny wrote:
> On 5/6/21 7:37 AM, Ash Holsenback wrote:
>> On 5/6/21 7:35 AM, William F Pokorny wrote:
>>> I second your thought not enough detail about the caching got into 
>>> the documentation. At least, I've never run across it - those beta 
>>> change notes are there, but that is not where most will look for 
>>> documentation of the output file caching.
>>
>> i do not... y'all were just looking in the wrong place
>>
> 
> Perhaps we do disagree. :-) I was aware of the documentation to which 
> you pointed us.
> 
> I believe our documentation would be better if somewhere it included 
> everything in those beta release notes about output file caching - after 
> the first paragraph. Those realease notes are well written and clear 
> with several useful tips. I believe our documentation today describes 
> switches with not enough about implications and use - information in 
> those release to release notes.

isn't that covered in changes.txt and / or revision.txt

Post a reply to this message