|
|
On 3-10-2018 12:48, Bald Eagle wrote:
> "Kenneth" <kdw### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>
>> The interesting thing about two-axis rotation is that the object *eventually*
>> assumes every possible orientation, at least according to the many visual tests
>> I've done (or else I'm much mistaken!)
>
> I was going to point out that if you think about this from a spherical
> coordinate standpoint - there is no difference.
>
> The distinction between 2 and 3-axis is artificial.
>
> Perhaps you're just "adding" or "fiddling" too much - adding a jitter where
> there ought to be a flow.
>
Yes, that is an important, if not fundamental, point.
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|