On 6/9/2017 12:19 PM, clipka wrote:
> Am 09.06.2017 um 14:41 schrieb Jim Holsenback:
>> On 6/9/2017 8:15 AM, Jim Holsenback wrote:
>>> ... they didn't make it into the docs most likely due to a foo
>>> somewhere with regex pattern matching in WikiDocGen. I'll have a look
>>
>> i take it back ... a quick look on the wiki and i think it's the markup
>> concerning < and > that appear (and is missing in one place ... the box
>> declaration) where > and < should have been used in the predefined
>> text blocks that encloses the examples. this weekend i'll make some
>> edits and test my theory.
> 
> I concur.

confirmed

> the help file viewer apparently misinterprets it as a (malformed) HTML
> tag. The text is actually in the help file, but it's not displayed.

same deal with the nix and mac versions ... i turned on debugging and 
ran WikiDocGen before making the edits on the wiki and discovered a few 
things that i've had to mark as fix me. basically i need to test <pre> 
blocks rather than JUST keep reading until i find </pre> ... btw: i 
looked at the history on the wiki and i guess a mea culpa is in order 
because it looks like i'm the one who busted that passage. check your 
email ... i've posted an update to include in the next release

Post a reply to this message