On 8-9-2016 18:04, clipka wrote:
> Coincidently, when I read your post I was just about to wrap up some
> slight change to the reserved words mechanism, with the intention to
> make it easier to maintain. It turns out that the way I designed it, the
> modified mechanism would have been even _less_ robust against this
> particular case; so you've just prevented me from submitting
> ill-conceived code ;)
>
>
> I think I'll leave this unfixed in UberPOV for now, as it doesn't do any
> real harm, and wait until that mentioned change (in a more robust
> variant) trickles in from official POV-Ray.
>

Excellent! Glad to be of help ;-)

In future, I shall point to the correct version number as requested. I 
have been sadly remiss in the matter. :-)

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message