Le 06/03/2014 08:32, jhu nous fit lire :
> d'oh! Looks like the binary is slower than the one compiled with gcc (slower by
> about 10 seconds on the benchmark scene, clang 3.3 {freebsd 10.0} vs. gcc 4.2.1
> {freebsd 9.2}). Oh well.

From measurement on linux, gcc 4.7 / clang 3.3 (4.2.1), it depends on
the availability of HT.
gcc is better with HT, clang is better without. And icpc (intel
compiler) wins everytime.

Post a reply to this message