|
|
Am 19.11.2013 15:18, schrieb James Holsenback:
> On 11/19/2013 09:02 AM, clipka wrote:
>> Am 19.11.2013 13:52, schrieb James Holsenback:
>>
>>>> 2. The description for the forth diagram in this section "To give the
>>>> tightness
>>>> value full control over the spotlight's appearance use radius 0
>>>> falloff 90. As
>>>> you can see from the figure below." should be correct.
>>>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>>> I think that is radius 90 falloff 90 for the diagram.
>>>
>>> i played around with this (quickly) and it doesn't seem to make a
>>> difference if it's 0 or 90
>>
>> It does as soon as tightness comes into play.
>
> ah ... yes i know. i guess i should have said for a given tightness both
> radius values look practically the same
For a tightness of 0 it makes quite the difference, so there's reason to
believe that the same goes for other small values.
Post a reply to this message
|
|