> Fabien<fab### [at] gmailcom>  wrote:
>
>> The "new" IRTC literally sucked, quality-wise, (the images,
>> not the site), compared to what was produced some years
>> ago.
>
> While you may have some points worth arguing regarding maintaining of the IRTC
> site, I think it's a bit harsh to lay such criticism on the images in the newer
> contest site (I assume you refer to the TINA CheP).

I was referring to www.irtc.org. For the rest, see my reply to
Robert McGregor.

> Would you criticize a 5 year old about his crude drawing of a person and tell
> him it sucks?  Perhaps one day that 5 year old will be Van Gogh, having learned
> and developed far beyond that initial crude drawing.

I'm not bashing a 5-year old future Van Gogh, I'm talking about a
talented 10-years old which stops drawing for three years, and is
less talented at 13 than (s)he was at 10.

Fabien.

Post a reply to this message