scott <sco### [at] scottcom> wrote:
> >>         At the same time, if they can make CGI that is very hard to tell 
> >> from
> >> real stunts, why should I value real stunts more?
> >
> >  Because it's admirable when a film crew puts some effort and work into
> > making the film.

> Sure, but would you pay extra for a film where the stunts had actually been 
> performed rather than just CG (if there was little or no difference to the 
> outcome)?  I don't think many people would.  Which is why it isn't done.

  It's not about paying extra, but about *more* people paying in the first
place (assuming more people appreciate the effort and skill put into the
movie).

> >  Sad will be the day when movies will be made 100% by people sitting in
> > front of a computer and clicking with the mouse.

> There's a reason why most things in the world are done that way now, because 
> it's more efficient.

  Art shouldn't be about efficiency. Thus I stand by my opinion.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message