Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> > Nodoby will ever take a photo seriously.

> Apparently this is already the case in court in the USA. It's almost 
> impossible to introduce a photograph as evidence without the photographer 
> being there to say "Yep, that's what I saw."

  As if eyewitness testimony would be more reliable than photographic one...

> >   What's the value of photography if you can get *whatever you want* with
> > just a couple of mouse clicks?

> It is a shame. Nowadays it's hard to even go to a movie just to see the 
> special effects, too. :-)

  What I find really sad is when a movie uses magnificent stunts without
even a single pixel being added by computer, and most people just dismiss
it as a CGI effect.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message