Chambers wrote:
> 
>> The majority believe that any exercise of power which results in the 
>> majority's benefiting is good.
>
> If all men are equal, then I don't see how you can escape that conclusion.

What if the young decide to unburden themselves of the elderly? or the 
mentally handicapped?

What if a family of ten needs your house more than you do?

> A hot dog isn't impinging on your rights.  Your desire to offer services 
> to the public carries with it certain responsibilities, including 
> offering access to everyone.

Good thing you don't believe in private property, it's a mighty 
inconvenient concept.

> 
> That same hot dog, to use your imagery, would require you to install a 
> wheel-chair ramp to your door, and a braille sign out front.  I don't 
> see you complaining about those requirements, though.

I'm more surprised to not see you complaining. The disabled are a mights 
small minority.

> 
> To clarify: limited government set up for the benefit of the ordinary 
> citizens.  You're arguing against that last part.

A government needs power to be "set up" for anyone. The more we move 
towards totalitarianism, the more power the government has to benefit 
their cronies.

  -Shay

Post a reply to this message