On 08/27/09 19:22, Shay wrote:
>> The same argument can be applied to libraries, police and fire
>> departments. How do you feel about those?
>
> Not federal!!!!!! What federal money that does go into the library
> system should not.

	You seem to be complaining not based on principle, but on quibbles. You 
act as if you're invoking an unceasing willingness to conform to the 
Constitution, regardless of whether that's a good thing, or not. The 
Constitution is merely a document, not a source for morality or ethics.

	What different does it make if it's state vs federal? One way or other, 
it's taking money out of your pocket, which was your complaint. I wasn't 
aware that you think it's OK to forcefully take money from your pocket 
if the _state_ is doing it, rather than the federal government.
	
> That's it! I'm willing to discuss, but pointing out *obvious*
> distinctions between the Post Office, Fire Department, etc. and Public
> Medicine to the ignorant is over. This could go on forever. Learn how

	OK, I'll play along. How about states mandating UHC?


-- 
I am reading a very interesting book about anti-gravity. I just can't 
put it down.

Post a reply to this message