Darren New wrote:
> Shay wrote:
>> Which do you think I'd choose?
> 
> I don't think that's a valid analogy, so I won't address it.
> 
> The nature of insurance is that you don't pay for your own outlays, 
> unless they happen to be below the premiums. The only *cost* to 
> insurance is the overhead.
> 
>> Amendment or no, it's wrong.
> 
> Then why bring up the point of the amendments?
> 

I'm not preaching that Capitalism is a panacea or that our Constitution 
is perfect, but my principal fear is what will (continue to) happen as 
we lose our constitutional protection from the majority.

However, socialism gained by any other, even legal, means is just as 
dangerous.

  -Shay

Post a reply to this message