"Mueen Nawaz" <m.n### [at] ieee org> wrote in message
news:4a0ecfce$1@news.povray.org...
> somebody wrote:
> > It's exactly the same situation with copyright. I did not wish for you
to
> > have copies of my work, and I had the right to not have you copies of my
> > work. You have illegally taken away my ability to exercise those
benefits
> > and rights. What is being taken away is not the piece of paper (car
title or
> > copyright statement), but whatever rights are granted to the rightful
owner
> > *on* that piece of paper.
> Hmm... So let's say that I administer a gym run by the city (it's
> public). I don't like you, so I don't let you in. I have illegally taken
> away your ability to exercise your benefits and rights.
>
> Is that theft?
No because it doesn't involve anything I own.
> I don't serve a white person in my restaurant because of his race. Is
> that theft?
No because it doesn't involve anything I own.
Post a reply to this message
|
