On Fri, 15 May 2009 20:14:52 -0600, somebody wrote:

> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message
> news:4a0e0037$1@news.povray.org...
>> On Fri, 15 May 2009 17:42:27 -0600, somebody wrote:
> 
>> > Ah, I see. That argument hit a dead end, so we are back to square one
>> > with the arbitrary "non-physical" defense.
> 
>> <sigh>  I see no point in continuing this discussion.  I've explained
>> it several times already, and you refuse to understand.  Don't know how
>> I can explain it any more simply.
> 
> How about answering the four or five questions I asked above with simple
> yes or no?

Because we've been round and round on the same topic already.  Answering 
the questions is not a matter of a "simple yes or no" because you will 
then ask questions about my answers and the cycle will start all over 
again.

And I'm tired of repeating myself.

Jim

Post a reply to this message