"Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message
news:4a0e0037$1@news.povray.org...
> On Fri, 15 May 2009 17:42:27 -0600, somebody wrote:

> > Ah, I see. That argument hit a dead end, so we are back to square one
> > with the arbitrary "non-physical" defense.

> <sigh>  I see no point in continuing this discussion.  I've explained it
> several times already, and you refuse to understand.  Don't know how I
> can explain it any more simply.

How about answering the four or five questions I asked above with simple yes
or no?

Post a reply to this message