On Fri, 15 May 2009 17:42:27 -0600, somebody wrote:
> Ah, I see. That argument hit a dead end, so we are back to square one> with the arbitrary "non-physical" defense.
<sigh> I see no point in continuing this discussion. I've explained it
several times already, and you refuse to understand. Don't know how I
can explain it any more simply.
Jim
