|
|
>> ...and then I spend 2 hours drawing squares and cubes, and shifting
>> algebra around to painstakingly derive [a special case of] the
>> binomial theorum from first principles. The euphoria of finally
>> figuring out the hidden pattern is topped only by the frustration at
>> discovering that somebody else already figured this out - several
>> thousand years ago.
>
> Actually, I kinda like the idea of *knowing* that a certain formula,
> derived by someone else, is correct, and that I am not simply taking it
> on faith.
Well, it's not so much that. Obviously I suck at math and there are
several centuries (if not millennia) of mathematicians far more clever
than me to check it. It's more that I'm curios to know *why* it works.
(For example, if you have a group of size X, it has subgroups of every
size that is a factor of X - including 1 and X itself. I still don't
completely understand why, but it's still cool.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|