"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:49f5c8c1@news.povray.org...
> scott <sco### [at] scottcom> wrote:

> > Whilst true, a bit of a silly statistic only looking at half the story.
A
> > better measure would be "lives saved as a direct result of actions minus
> > lives lost as a direct result of actions".  I suspect doctors would be
> > firmly ahead by a long way then...

>   OTOH it's basically impossible to measure how many lives are saved
thanks
> to guns.
>
>   For example, how many lives were saved thanks to the Normandy landings
> and subsequent fall of Germany? Completely impossible to say.

Germans were not exactly fighting with forks and spoons.

Post a reply to this message